|
|
Human Papilloma Virus Testing of Cervical Pap Smears | |
|
|
Description: |
Ninety-five percent (95%) of cervical neoplasia is considered to be due to infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV is a sexually transmitted disease which occurs after a woman becomes sexually active. Not all HPV viral types are oncogenic, not all infect the cervix, and only a small number of women who develop HPV infection, even with the oncogenic forms of HPV, will develop in-situ or invasive cervical cancer. It has been well established that the majority of squamous cell cancers of the cervix progress through a series of well-defined preinvasive lesions and that during this usually lengthy process, the disease can be easily detected by Pap smear screening. During this preinvasive stage, cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) can be controlled with nearly uniform success.
The Bethesda System (TBS) was introduced (1988) as a standardized grading system for Pap smears. Frankly negative or positive smears are reported as such. In between these two extremes are various levels of equivocal abnormality. These may be due to inflammatory disease or may be precursors of a malignant process.
Atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASCUS); atypical glandular cells of unknown significance (AGUS); low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) are designations given to these undetermined cell types.
Screening for cervical carcinoma or precursors to cervical carcinoma with Pap smears has potential weaknesses:
Except for a subset of Pap smear results, no consistent methodological approach to the woman who has a Pap smear with one of these undetermined cell types has been developed. Women with HSIL or AGUS reports are recommended to have colposcopy directed biopsy and endocervical curettage, as the risk of an cervical cancer precursor is significant (15% of women with AGUS have HSIL or adenocarcinoma in situ), and those with HSIL or in-situ carcinoma on biopsy are recommended to have resectional or ablation procedures.
ASCUS or LSIL, however, are a more problematic issue, for almost all of these findings are the result of benign disease (5-10% of women with ASCUS have HSIL disease; the majority of LSIL regress without treatment, but 15% of women with LSIL on Pap smear will have HSIL on colposcopy and biopsy). A diagnosis of ASCUS identifies a woman who is at greater than background risk for prevalent and incipient cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2), CIN3, and cancer. Studies have shown that 20% - 60% of ASCUS changes are associated with CIN at colposcopic evaluation, but the vast majority of these (greater than 70%) are CIN1, a sign of usually benign HPV infection. The question of whom to refer for colposcopy and possible biopsy is such concern that the National Cancer Institute funded a trial to evaluate the best triage option for women with equivocal and low-grade Pap smears in a randomized trial that began in 1995, ending in 2001.
Three follow-up options have been proposed for women with ASCUS or LSIL: immediate colposcopy, accelerated repeat Pap testing, and testing for the presence of HPV. Immediate colposcopy would theoretically detect all HSILs. However, the positive predictive value would be extremely low due to the low (5-10%) prevalence of high-grade disease among women with ASCUS, whereas the anxiety and costs generated are high. Repeat cytology may not be cost-effective due to a high rate of repeat abnormal cytology findings requiring colposcopic evaluation. Additionally, accuracy of the Pap test is low (sensitivity = 51%-66%) and reproducibility is poor.
More than 70 types of HPV have been identified. However, only 23 of these infect the uterine cervix; of these, only one-half are associated with SIL or invasive cervical cancer. These are further classified into low-risk types, HPV 6 and 11, and high-risk types, most commonly 16, 18, 31, and 45, which account for more than 80 percent of all invasive cervical cancers. An unknown percentage of women infected with HPV will develop either low-grade SIL (LSIL) or high-grade SIL (HSIL). One-third of all grades of SIL will regress, whereas 41 percent persist and 25 percent progress. Of lesions that progress, 10 percent progress to carcinoma in-situ and 1 percent to invasive cancer. Three-quarters of all grades of SIL will not progress.
Because the large majority of women with ASCUS. ASGUS, or LSIL will not have HSIL or in-situ carcinoma, it has recently been recommended by some that testing for HPV infection could be an alternative to triaging women to biopsy or observation.
One HPV DNA test by Digene Corporation is FDA approved for marketing under a PMA developed in 1995. The Hybrid Capture HPV DNA Assay is approved to aid in the triage of patients with equivocal or ASCUS Pap smear results in order to better determine the need for referrals to colposcopy; to serve as an adjunct to the Pap smear in the identification of women who may be at increased risk for squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL); to distinguish between infections with HPV types which are principally associated with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), and HPV types typically associated with SIL of all grades, especially high-grade SIL (HSIL) and invasive cancer of the cervix; to aid in the diagnosis of sexually transmitted disease. On 31 March 2003, the FDA expanded approval of the Digene HC2 High-Risk HPV DNA Test to include use for screening in conjunction with the Pap smear of women over the age of 30.
Two qualitative, in-vitro tests designed for HPV genotyping have been approved by the FDA. Cervista™ HPV 16/18, which is marketed by Hologic Inc., was approved by the FDA in March 2009. Cervista™ HPV 16/18 specifically detects HPV 16 and 18. Most recently, in March 2011, the FDA approved the cobas® HPV Test (Roche Diagnostics) which allows for HPV 16 and 18 genotyping concurrently with high-risk testing.
|
|
|
Policy/ Coverage: |
Meets Primary Coverage Criteria Or Is Covered For Contracts Without Primary Coverage Criteria
HPV DNA testing meets primary coverage criteria for effectiveness and is covered for women 30 years of age or older as an adjunct to a screening cervical Pap smear for women with the Wellness Benefit.
HPV DNA testing meets member benefit certificate primary coverage criteria that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness for women with an equivocal or ASCUS Pap smear result in order to better determine the need for referrals to colposcopy; to serve as an adjunct to the Pap smear in the identification of women who may be at increased risk for squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL); to distinguish between infections with HPV types which are principally associated with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), and HPV types typically associated with SIL of all grades, especially high-grade SIL (HSIL) and invasive cancer of the cervix; to aid in the diagnosis of sexually transmitted disease.
Does Not Meet Primary Coverage Criteria Or Is Investigational For Contracts Without Primary Coverage Criteria
Additional testing to identify the specific genotype of HPV does not meet member benefit certificate primary coverage criteria that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness.
For members with contracts without primary coverage criteria, additional testing to identify the specific genotype of HPV is considered investigational. Investigational services are specific contract exclusions in most member benefit certificates of coverage.
Note: Screening tests are exclusions in most member benefit certificates of coverage except for coverage based on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) screening recommendations for non-grandfathered plans and those contracts with wellness benefits (which like PPACA, covers specific screening procedures). (Effective 8/2011)
|
|
|
Rationale: |
Data from the ALTS trial showed that triage of ASC-US smears using HPV testing for triage to immediate colposcopy was more sensitive and equally specific in identifying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) as repeat Pap smear using ASC-US as the threshold for colposcopy referral. Based primarily on the results of this trial, recent guidelines issued by the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology recommend either repeat Pap smear, immediate colposcopy, or HPV testing for women who have ASC-US Pap smears. HPV testing can be performed on the remaining liquid media used as part of the preparation of monolayer slides. Otherwise, if the original Pap smear was prepared conventionally, HPV testing would require an additional office visit to perform an additional Pap smear.
Noncoverage for testing of specific genotype is based on lack of medical literature that such identification results in improved health outcomes.
2010 Update
A review of the medical literature did not identify any randomized controlled trials that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
In August 2009, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists published a practice bulletin on cervical cytology screening. (16) A systematic review of the MEDLINE database for the period of June 1985 to July 2009 was described and graded recommendations provided. However, details of the strength of evidence and quality of included studies were not provided. Level A recommendations (good and consistent evidence) were:
2011 Update
A search of the MEDLINE database which was conducted through April 2011. The literature search focused mostly on HPV genotyping and did not identify any new literature that would prompt a change in the coverage statement. The current recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the United States Preventive Services Task Force do not include recommendations for HPV genotyping. The coverage statement is unchanged.
2012 Update
A literature search was conducted through September 2012. There was no new randomized trials, practice guidelines, position statements or other publications identified that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2013 Update
A search of the MEDLINE database was conducted through September 2013. There was no new information identified that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2018 Update
A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE database through February 2018. There was no new information added that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2019 Update
Annual policy review completed with a literature search using the MEDLINE database through February 2019. No new literature was identified that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2020 Update
A literature search was conducted through January 2020. There was no new information identified that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2021 Update
Annual policy review completed with a literature search using the MEDLINE database through February 2021. No new literature was identified that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2022 Update
Annual policy review completed with a literature search using the MEDLINE database through February 2022. No new literature was identified that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2023 Update
Annual policy review completed with a literature search using the MEDLINE database through February 2023. No new literature was identified that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2024 Update
Annual policy review completed with a literature search using the MEDLINE database through February 2024. No new literature was identified that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
|
|
|
CPT/HCPCS: | |
|
|
References: |
ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 109: Cervical cytology screening. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114(6):1409-20. Cain JM, Howett MK.(2000) Preventing cervical cancer. Science 2000; 288:1753-1755. Castle PE, Sadorra M, et al.(2006) Pilot study of commercialized human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assay: comparison of HPV risk group to cytology and histology. J Clin Microbiol, 2006; 44:3915-7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).(2007) Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR, 2007;56 RR2. Cox JT, Lorincz AT, Schiffman MH, et al.(1995) Human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture appears to be useful in triaging women with a cytologic dx of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance. Am J Ob Gyn 1995; 172:946-954. Cox JT.(1999) Evaluating the role of HPV testing for women with equivocal Papanicolaou test findings. JAMA 1999; 281:1645-1647. Cuzick J, Clavel C, et al.(2006) Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer, 2006; 119:1095-1101. Cuzick J, Szarewski A, et al.(2003) Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human pappilomavirus: the HART study. Lancet, 2003; 362:1871-6. Dehn D, Torkko KC, Shroyer KR.(2007) Human papillomavirus testing and molecular markers of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol, 2007; 111:1-14. Guo M, Sneige N, et al.(2007) Distribution and viral load of eight oncogenic types of human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV 16 integration status in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma. Mod Pathol, 2007; 20:256-66.2007. Hesselink AT, Bulkmans NWJ, et al.(2006) Cross-sectional comparison of an automated Hybrid Capture 2 assay and the consensus GP5+/6+ PCR method in a population-based cervical screening program. J Clin Microbiol, 2006; 44:3680-5. Khan MJ, Castle PE, et al.(2005) The elevated 10-year risk of cervical precancer and cancer in women with human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 or 18 and the possible utility of type-specific HPV testing in clinical practice. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2005; 97:1072-9. Kinney W, Stoler MH, Castle PE, et al.(2010) Patient safety and the next generation of HPV DNA Tests. Am J Clin Pathol 2010;134:193-199. Koliopoulos G, Arbyn M, et al.(2007) Diagnostic accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies. Gynecologic Oncol, 2007; 104:232-46. Kosel S, Burggraf S, et al.(2003) Type-specific detection of human papillomaviruses in a routine laboratory setting-improved sensitivity and specificity of PCR and sequence analysis compared to direct hybridisation. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2003; 41:787-91. Kulasingam SL, Kim JJ, et al.(2006) Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS). J Natl Cancer Inst, 2006; 98:92-100. Kulasingam SL, Myers ER, et al.(2006) Cost-effectiveness of extending cervical cancer screening intervals among women with prior normal pap tests. Obstet Gynecol, 2006; 107(2 Pt 1):321-8. Lorincz AT, Richart RM.(2003) Human Papillomavirus DNA testing as adjunct to cytology in cervical screening programs. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2003; 127:959-968. Manos MM, Kinney WK, Hurley LB, et al.(1999) Identifying women with cervical neoplasia. Using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results. JAMA 1999; 281:1605-1610. Plummer M, Schiffman M, et al.(2007) A 2-year prospective study of human papillomavirus persistence among women with a cytological diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. J Infect Dis, 2007; 195:1582-9. Ronnet BM, Manos MM, Ransley JE, et al.(1999) Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): Cytopathologic features, histopathologic results, and human papillomavirus DNA detection. Human Pathology 1999; 30:817-825. Safaeian M, Solomon D, et al.(2007) Risk of precancer and follow-up management strategies for women with human papillomavirus-negative atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Obstet Gynecol, 2007; 109:1325-31. Sandri MT, Lentati P, et al.(2006) Comparison of the Digene HC2 assay and the Roche AMPLICOR human papillomavirus (HPV) test for detection of high-risk HPV genotypes in cervical cancer. J Clin Microbiol, 2006; 44:2141-6. Sawaya GF, Brown AD, Washington AE, et al.(2001) Current approaches to cervical-cancer screening. NEJM 2001; 344:1603-1607. Schiffman M.(2007) Integration of human papillomavirus vaccination, cytology, and human papillomavirus testing. Cancer Cytopathol, 2007; 111:145-53. Shang-Lang H, Angel C, et al.(2006) Comparison between the Hybrid Capture II test and an SPF1/GP6+ PCR-based assay for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical swab samples. J Clin Microbiol, 2006, 44:1733-9. Sherman ME, Lorincz AT, et al.(2003) Baseline cytology, human papillomavirus testing, and risk for cervical neoplasia: a 10-year cohort analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2003; 95:46-52. Soderlund-Strand A, Rymark P, et al.(2005) Comparison between the Hybrid Capture II test and a PCR-based human pappilomavirus detection method for diagnosis and posttreatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Clin Microbiol, 2005; 43:3260-6. Solomon D, Schiffman M, Tarone R.(2001) Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: baseline results from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93:293-299. Spitzer M, Burk RD.(2005) ACOG Practice Bulletin. Human Papillomavirus. ACOG Pract Bull No. 61. Stevens MP, Garland SM, et al.(2007) Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture 2 assay and Roche AMPLICOR and LINEAR ARRAY HPV tests in detecting high-risk HPV genotypes in women with previous abnormal Pap smears. J Clin Microbiol, 2007:[Epub ahead of print]. Stoler MH, Castle PE, et al.(2007) The expanded use of HPV testing in gynecologic practice per ASCCP-guided management requires the use of well-validated assays. Am J Clin Pathol, 2007; 127:335-7. The atypical squamous cells of undetermined significant/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions triage study group.(2000) Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with cytologic evidence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: baseline data from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92:397-402. United States Preventive Services Task Force.(2011) Cervical Cancer, Screening. 2003. Accessed at http://www.USPreventiveServicesTaskForce.org. Last accessed May 23, 2011. Woodman CB, Collins SI, Young LS.(2007) The natural history of cervical HPV infection: unresolved issues. Nat Rev Cancer, 2007; 7:11-22. Wright Jr TC, Schiffman M, et al.(2004) Interim guidance for the use of human pappilomavirus DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening. Obstet Gynecol, 2004; 103:304-9. Zuna RE, Allen RA, et al.(2007) Distribution of HPV genotypes in 282 women with cervical lesions: evidence for three categories of intraepithelial lesions based on morphology and HPV type. Mod Pathol, 2007; 20:167-74. |
|
|
Group specific policy will supersede this policy when applicable. This policy does not apply to the Wal-Mart Associates Group Health Plan participants or to the Tyson Group Health Plan participants.
CPT Codes Copyright © 2025 American Medical Association. |