|
|
Stem Cell Growth Factor, Romiplostim (e.g., Nplate) | |
|
|
Description: |
Romiplostim is a thrombopoiesis stimulating protein (peptibody) that binds to and activates the human thrombopoietin receptor despite having no sequence homology with human thrombopoietin. Romiplostim has been shown to produce a dose dependent increase in platelet counts in healthy volunteers and improve platelet counts during short term use in individuals with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP).
The FDA has expressed concerns over the limited clinical data available on romiplostim. This included safety concerns which included reticulin fibrosis in the bone marrow, which is associated with benign and malignant conditions, blood clots, immunogenicity and thrombocytopenia recurrence after therapy is stopped. The drug may also increase the proportion of blast cells in the peripheral blood of some individuals with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Regulatory Status
On January 28, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration approved Romiplostim for adults and pediatric individuals (including term neonates) acutely exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation to increase survival.
Coding
See CPT/HCPCS Code section below.
|
|
|
Policy/ Coverage: |
Effective August 15, 2023, prior approval is required for Romiplostim (e.g., Nplate).
Effective July 17, 2024
Meets Primary Coverage Criteria or Is Covered for Contracts Without Primary Coverage Criteria
Romiplostim meets member benefit primary coverage criteria that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness when ALL the following criteria are met:
FDA Labeled Indications:
For FDA labeled indications, all products must be dosed in accordance with the FDA label unless otherwise specified.
IMMUNE THROMBOCYTOPENIA
INITIAL APPROVAL STANDARD REVIEW for up to 6 months:
CONTINUED APPROVAL for up to 1 year:
HEMATOPOIETIC SYNDROME OF ACUTE RADIATION SYNDROME
STANDARD REVIEW for up to one month for one dose.
Limitations of Use:
Off-label Indications:
For off-label indications, authorizations will not exceed 10 microgram per kilogram of body weight per week unless medical literature supports a higher dose.
CHEMOTHERAPY INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA (CIT)
INITIAL APPROVAL STANDARD REVIEW for up to 3 months:
CONTINUED APPROVAL for up to 9 months:
Policy Guidelines
Acute radiation syndrome is covered due to the following events:
Examples of risk factors for bleeding (not all inclusive):
Dosage and Administration
Dosing per FDA Guidelines
The recommended dose of Romiplostim is based on indication.
Romiplostim should be administered as a subcutaneous injection by a healthcare professional.
For Individuals with ITP (Nplate, 2022):
Authorization will be given to allow up to 10 mcg/kg/week. Providers must dose in accordance with the FDA label.
For Adult and Pediatric Individuals (including term neonates) with hematopoietic syndrome of acute radiation syndrome (Nplate, 2022):
The recommended dose of Romiplostim is 10 mcg/kg administered once as a subcutaneous injection. Administer the dose as soon as possible after suspected or confirmed exposure to radiation levels greater than 2 gray (Gy).
Romiplostim is available in 125mcg, 250mcg, or 500mcg lyophilized powder in a single-dose vial.
Please refer to a separate policy on Site of Care or Site of Service Review (policy #2018030) for pharmacologic/biologic medications.
Does Not Meet Primary Coverage Criteria Or Is Investigational For Contracts Without Primary Coverage Criteria
Romiplostim for any indication or circumstance not described above, does not meet member benefit certificate primary coverage criteria that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness in improving outcomes, including but not limited to the following:
For members with contracts without primary coverage criteria, the use of Romiplostim in any indication or circumstance not described above is considered investigational, including but not limited to the following:
Investigational services are specific contract exclusions in most member benefit certificates of coverage.
Effective January 2024 to July 16, 2024
Meets Primary Coverage Criteria or Is Covered for Contracts Without Primary Coverage Criteria
Romiplostim meets member benefit primary coverage criteria that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness for individuals with immune thrombocytopenia when ALL the following criteria are met:
INITIAL APPROVAL STANDARD REVIEW for up to 6 months:
CONTINUED APPROVAL for up to 1 year:
Individuals with Hematopoietic Syndrome of Acute Radiation Syndrome
Meets Primary Coverage Criteria or Is Covered for Contracts Without Primary Coverage Criteria
STANDARD REVIEW for up to one month for one dose.
Romiplostim meets member benefit primary coverage criteria that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness for individuals with hematopoietic syndrome of acute radiation syndrome to increase survival in adults and in pediatric individuals (including term neonates) acutely exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation (FDA, 2021) when dosed in accordance with the FDA label.
Limitations of Use:
Dosage and Administration
Dosing per FDA Guidelines
The recommended dose of Romiplostim is based on indication.
Romiplostim is available in 125mcg, 250mcg, or 500mcg lyophilized powder in a single-dose vial.
Romiplostim should be administered as a subcutaneous injection by a healthcare professional.
For Individuals with ITP (FDA, 2021):
Authorization will be given to allow up to 10 mcg/kg/week. Providers must dose in accordance with the FDA label.
For Adult and Pediatric Individuals (including term neonates) with hematopoietic syndrome of acute radiation syndrome (FDA, 2021):
The recommended dose of Romiplostim is 10 mcg/kg administered once as a subcutaneous injection. Administer the dose as soon as possible after suspected or confirmed exposure to radiation levels greater than 2 gray (Gy).
Policy Guidelines:
Examples of risk factors for bleeding (not all inclusive):
Please refer to a separate policy on Site of Care or Site of Service Review (policy #2018030) for pharmacologic/biologic medications.
Does Not Meet Primary Coverage Criteria Or Is Investigational For Contracts Without Primary Coverage Criteria
Romiplostim for any indication or circumstance not described above, does not meet member benefit certificate primary coverage criteria that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness in improving outcomes, including but not limited to the following:
For members with contracts without primary coverage criteria, the use of Romiplostim in any indication or circumstance not described above is considered investigational, including but not limited to the following:
Investigational services are specific contract exclusions in most member benefit certificates of coverage.
Effective May 2021 through December 2023
Meets Primary Coverage Criteria Or Is Covered For Contracts Without Primary Coverage Criteria
Individuals with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
Treatment with romiplostim meets primary coverage criteria for effectiveness in improving health outcomes and is covered to decrease the risk of bleeding for individuals with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP):
Individuals with Hematopoietic Syndrome of Acute Radiation Syndrome
Treatment with romiplostim meets primary coverage criteria that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness in improving health outcomes to increase survival in adults and in pediatric individuals (including term neonates) acutely exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation (FDA, 2021) .
Limitations of Use:
Dosage and Administration
Dosing per FDA Guidelines
For Adult Individuals with ITP (FDA, 2021)
For Pediatric Individuals with ITP (FDA, 2021)
For Adult and Pediatric Individuals (including term neonates) with hematopoietic syndrome of acute radiation syndrome (FDA, 2021)
Please refer to a separate policy on Site of Care or Site of Service Review (policy #2018030) for pharmacologic/biologic medications.
Does Not Meet Primary Coverage Criteria Or Is Investigational For Contracts Without Primary Coverage Criteria
The use of romiplostim for any indication or circumstance other than listed above does not meet member benefit certificate primary coverage criteria that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness in improving health outcomes.
For members with contracts without primary coverage criteria, the use of romiplostim for any indication or circumstance not listed above is considered investigational.
Investigational services are specific contract exclusions in most member benefit certificates of coverage.
Effective April 2020 to April 2021
Treatment with romiplostim (Nplate) meets primary coverage criteria for effectiveness and is covered to decrease the risk of bleeding for patients with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP):
Treatment with romiplostim (Nplate), in such patients, meets primary coverage criteria until the platelet count reaches 300,000/ µL.
Note- romiplostim (Nplate) should be discontinued if the platelet count does not increase after 4 weeks at the maximum dose (10mcg/kg).
Dosage and Administration
Please refer to a separate policy on Site of Care or Site of Service Review (policy #2018030) for pharmacologic/biologic medications.
The use of romiplostim (Nplate) for any indication not listed above does not meet member benefit certificate primary coverage criteria that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness.
For members with contracts without primary coverage criteria, the use of romiplostim (Nplate) for any indication not listed above is considered investigational.
Investigational services are specific contract exclusions in most member benefit certificates of coverage.
Effective May 2019 to April 2020
Treatment with romiplostim (Nplate) meets primary coverage criteria for effectiveness and is covered to decrease the risk of bleeding for patients with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) when:
Treatment with romiplostim (Nplate), in such patients, meets primary coverage criteria until the platelet count reaches 300,000/ µL.
Note- romiplostim (Nplate) should be discontinued if the platelet count does not increase after 4 weeks at the maximum dose (10mcg/kg).
Dosage and Administration
Per FDA label guidelines
Please refer to a separate policy on Site of Care or Site of Service Review (policy #2018030) for pharmacologic/biologic medications.
The use of romiplostim (Nplate) for any indication not listed above does not meet member benefit certificate primary coverage criteria that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness.
For members with contracts without primary coverage criteria, the use of romiplostim (Nplate) for any indication not listed above is considered investigational. Investigational services are specific contract exclusions in most member benefit certificates of coverage.
Effective May 2013 to April 2019
Treatment with romiplostim (Nplate) meets primary coverage criteria for effectiveness and is covered to decrease the risk of bleeding for patients with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) when:
Treatment with romiplostim (Nplate), in such patients, meets primary coverage criteria until the platelet count reaches 300,000/ µL.
Note- romiplostim (Nplate) should be discontinued if the platelet count does not increase after 4 weeks at the maximum dose (10mcg/kg).
The use of romiplostim (Nplate) for any indication not listed above does not meet member benefit certificate primary coverage criteria that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness.
For members with contracts without primary coverage criteria, the use of romiplostim (Nplate) for any indication not listed above is considered investigational. Investigational services are specific contract exclusions in most member benefit certificates of coverage.
Effective prior to May 2013
Romiplostim (Nplate) meets primary coverage criteria for effectiveness and is covered to decrease the risk of bleeding for patients with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) when
There is no coverage for romiplostim when the platelet count is 300,000/µL or higher.
The use of romiplostim for any indication not listed as covered does not meet Primary Coverage Criteria of the applicable benefit certificate or health plan. The Criteria require, among other things, that there be scientific evidence of effectiveness, as defined in the Criteria. The Criteria exclude coverage of interventions if there is a lack of scientific evidence regarding the intervention, or if the available scientific evidence is in conflict or the subject of continuing debate.
For member benefit contracts or Plans with explicit exclusion language for experimental or investigational services, the use of romiplostim for any indication not listed as covered is not covered because it is considered experimental or investigational as defined in the applicable benefit contract or health plan, which excludes coverage of experimental or investigational treatment or services.
|
|
|
Rationale: |
The study to support FDA approval of Nplate by Kuter DJ et al were two parallel prospective, multicenter, international phase III studies that were randomized, placebo-controlled double blind trails lasting 6 months. The studies investigated Romiplostim vs. placebo in adults with chronic ITP which had either been splenectomized (N=63) of non-splenectomized (N=62) and had a mean of three platelet counts of 30,000/µL or less received subcutaneous injections of Romiplostim for 24 weeks. Doses were adjusted during the study to maintain a platelet count of 50,000/µL to 200,000/µL. Those assigned to placebo (N=21 for both groups) received adjusted doses of placebo through the study.
Objectives of the study were to assess the efficacy of romiplostim as measured by an increase platelet count of 50,000/µL during 6 of the last 8 weeks of the study and safety profile.
Results showed the splenectomized group had a durable platelet response in 16 of 42 in the Romiplostim group versus none in the placebo group (p=0.0013). In the non splenectomized group, 25 of the 41 that received romiplostim has a durable platelet response versus 3 of 21 in the placebo group (p<0.0001).
The study was funded by Amgen, Inc which in collaboration with the investigators, designed the study, did the statistical analysis, and interpreted the data which Amgen holds.
The product labeling, FDA approved in AUG 2008, indicates this drug should not be used in an attempt to normalize platelet counts.
2012 Update
A search of the MEDLINE database conducted through August 2012 did not reveal any new literature that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2014 Update
A literature search conducted through April 2014 did not reveal any new information that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2015 Update
A literature search conducted using the MEDLINE database through April 2015 did not reveal any new information that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2016 Update
A literature search conducted through April 2016 did not reveal any new information that would prompt a change in the coverage statement. The key identified literature is summarized below.
In a phase 3 double-blind study, Tarantino and colleagues aimed to assess whether romiplostim is safe and effective in children with immune thrombocytopenia of more than 6 months' duration (Tarantino, 2016). Eligible participants were children with immune thrombocytopenia aged 1 year to 17 years and mean platelet counts 30 × 109/L or less (mean of two measurements during the screening period) with no single count greater than 35 × 109/L, and were recruited from 27 sites in the USA, Canada, and Australia. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) through the interactive voice response system to receive weekly romiplostim or placebo for 24 weeks stratified by age (1 year to <6 years, 6 years to <12 years, 12 years to <18 years), adjusting the dose weekly from 1 μg/kg to 10 μg/kg to target platelet counts of 50-200 × 109/L. Patients and investigators were blinded to the treatment assignment. The primary analysis included all randomised patients and the safety analysis included all randomised patients who received at least one dose of investigational product. The primary endpoint, durable platelet response, was defined as achievement of weekly platelet responses (platelet counts ≥50 × 109/L without rescue drug use in the preceding 4 weeks) in 6 or more of the final 8 weeks (weeks 18-25). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, (NCT 01444417). Between Jan 24, 2012, and Sept 3, 2014, 62 patients were randomly assigned; 42 to romiplostim and 20 to placebo. Durable platelet response was seen in 22 (52%) patients in the romiplostim group and two (10%) in the placebo group (p=0·002, odds ratio 9·1 [95% CI 1·9-43·2]). Durable platelet response rates with romiplostim by age were 38% (3/8) for 1 year to younger than 6 years, 56% (10/18) for 6 years to younger than 12 years, and 56% (9/16) for 12 years to younger than 18 years. One (5%) of 19 patients in the placebo group had serious adverse events compared with 10 (24%) of 42 patients in the romiplostim group. Of these serious adverse events, headache and thrombocytosis, in one (2%) of 42 patients in the romiplostim group, were considered treatment related. No patients withdrew due to adverse events. In children with chronic immune thrombocytopenia, romiplostim induced a high rate of platelet response with no new safety signals. Ongoing romiplostim studies will provide further information as to long-term efficacy, safety, and remission in children with immune thrombocytopenia.
In a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study Mathias and colleagues sought to examine the effect of romiplostim on HRQoL and parental burden in children with primary ITP (Mathias, 2016). Children aged <18 years with ITP ≥6 months were randomly assigned to receive romiplostim or placebo for 24 weeks. The Kids' ITP Tool (KIT) was used to measure HRQoL and was administered to patients and/or their parents at baseline and weeks 8, 16, and 25. Mean KIT scores at each assessment and mean changes in KIT scores from baseline were calculated overall by treatment group and platelet response status. Psychometric properties of the KIT were evaluated and the minimally important difference (MID) was estimated for different KIT versions. Sixty-two patients (42 romiplostim and 20 placebo) were enrolled. Changes in KIT scores by treatment group showed numerically greater and more often statistically significant improvements from baseline to each assessment for children receiving romiplostim versus placebo. Mixed-effects analysis demonstrated statistically significantly greater reduction in parental burden from baseline in the romiplostim group versus placebo. Ranges for the MID were estimated as 9-13 points for the Child Self-Report version and 11-13 points for the Parent Impact version. The treatment with romiplostim may be associated with improved HRQoL in children with primary ITP and reduced burden to their parents.
2017 Update
A literature search conducted through April 2017 did not reveal any new information that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2018 Update
Annual policy review completed with a literature search using the MEDLINE database through April 2018. No new literature was identified that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2019 Update
A literature search conducted through April 2019 did not reveal any new information that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2020 Update
In a phase 3 double-blind study, eligible participants were children with immune thrombocytopenia aged 1 year to 17 years and mean platelet counts 30 × 10 9/L or less (mean of two measurements during the screening period) with no single count greater than 35 × 10 9/L, and were recruited from 27 sites in the USA, Canada, and Australia. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) through the interactive voice response system to receive weekly romiplostim or placebo for 24 weeks stratified by age (1 year to <6 years, 6 years to <12 years, 12 years to <18 years), adjusting the dose weekly from 1 μg/kg to 10 μg/kg to target platelet counts of 50–200 × 10 9/L. Patients and investigators were blinded to the treatment assignment. The primary analysis included all randomised patients and the safety analysis included all randomised patients who received at least one dose of investigational product. The primary endpoint, durable platelet response, was defined as achievement of weekly platelet responses (platelet counts ≥50 × 10 9/L without rescue drug use in the preceding 4 weeks) in 6 or more of the final 8 weeks (weeks 18–25). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 01444417.
Between Jan 24, 2012, and Sept 3, 2014, 62 patients were randomly assigned; 42 to romiplostim and 20 to placebo. Durable platelet response was seen in 22 (52%) patients in the romiplostim group and two (10%) in the placebo group (p=0·002, odds ratio 9·1 [95% CI 1·9–43·2]). Durable platelet response rates with romiplostim by age were 38% (3/8) for 1 year to younger than 6 years, 56% (10/18) for 6 years to younger than 12 years, and 56% (9/16) for 12 years to younger than 18 years. One (5%) of 19 patients in the placebo group had serious adverse events compared with 10 (24%) of 42 patients in the romiplostim group. Of these serious adverse events, headache and thrombocytosis, in one (2%) of 42 patients in the romiplostim group, were considered treatment related. No patients withdrew due to adverse events.
In children with chronic immune thrombocytopenia, romiplostim induced a high rate of platelet response with no new safety signals. Ongoing romiplostim studies will provide further information as to long-term efficacy, safety, and remission in children with immune thrombocytopenia. (Tarantino MD, Bussel JB, Blanchette VS, et al., 2016)
In a study of a thrombopoietic agent in children, patients with ITP of ≥ 6 months' duration were stratified by age 1:2:2 (12 months-< 3 years; 3-< 12 years; 12-< 18 years). Children received subcutaneous injections of romiplostim (n = 17) or placebo (n = 5) weekly for 12 weeks, with dose adjustments to maintain platelet counts between 50 × 10(9)/L and 250 × 10(9)/L. A platelet count ≥ 50 × 10(9)/L for 2 consecutive weeks was achieved by 15/17 (88%) patients in the romiplostim group and no patients in the placebo group (P = .0008). Platelet counts ≥ 50 × 10(9)/L were maintained for a median of 7 (range, 0-11) weeks in romiplostim patients and 0 (0-0) weeks in placebo patients (P = .0019). The median weekly dose of romiplostim at 12 weeks was 5 μg/kg. Fourteen responders received romiplostim for 4 additional weeks for assessment of pharmacokinetics. No patients discontinued the study. There were no treatment-related, serious adverse events. The most commonly reported adverse events in children, as in adults, were headache and epistaxis. In this short-term study, romiplostim increased platelet counts in 88% of children with ITP and was well-tolerated and apparently safe. The trial was registered with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00515203. (Bussel JB, Buchanan GR, Nugent DJ, et al., 2011)
2021 Update
Wong K, Chang PY, Fielden M, et. al. (2019) evaluated the pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of romiplostim alone and in combination with pegfilgrastim in a non-human primate (NHP) model of acute radiation syndrome (ARS). Male and female rhesus macaques were subjected to Cobalt-60 γ irradiation, at a dose of 550 cGy 24 h prior to subcutaneous administration of either romiplostim alone as a single (2.5 or 5.0 mg/kg on Day 1) or repeat dose (5.0 mg/kg on Days 1 and 8), pegfilgrastim alone as a repeat dose (0.3 µg/kg on Day 1 and 8), or a combination of both agents (romiplostim 5.0 mg/kg on Day 1; pegfilgrastim 0.3 µg/kg on Days 1 and 8). Clinical outcome, hematological parameters and PK were assessed throughout the 45 d study period post-irradiation.
Administration of romiplostim, pegfilgrastim or the combination of both resulted in significant improvements in hematological parameters, notably prevention of severe thrombocytopenia, compared with irradiated, vehicle control-treated NHPs. The largest hematologic benefit was observed when romiplostim and pegfilgrastim were administered as a combination therapy with much greater effects on both platelet and neutrophil recovery following irradiation compared to single agents alone.
These results indicate that romiplostim alone or in combination with pegfilgrastim is effective at improving hematological parameters in an NHP model of ARS. This study supports further study of romiplostim as a medical countermeasure to improve primary hemostasis and survival in ARS.
Efficacy studies of Nplate could not be conducted in humans with acute radiation syndrome for ethical and feasibility reasons. Approval for this indication was based on efficacy studies conducted in animals, Nplate’s effect on platelet count in healthy human volunteers and on data supporting Nplate’s effect on thrombocytopenia in patients with ITP and insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy.
Because of the uncertainty associated with extrapolating animal efficacy data to humans, the selection of a human dose for Nplate is aimed at providing platelet response to Nplate that is similar to that observed in efficacy studies conducted in animals. The recommended dose of Nplate for patients exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation is 10 mcg/kg administered once as a subcutaneous injection. The 10 mcg/kg dosing regimen for humans is based on population modeling and simulation analyses. For pediatric patients (including term neonates), extrapolation was based on data supporting Nplate’s effect on thrombocytopenia in patients with ITP and an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy.
The safety of Nplate for the acute radiation syndrome setting was assessed based on the clinical experience in patients with ITP and from a study with healthy volunteers. The efficacy of Nplate was studied in a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study in a non-human primate model of radiation injury. Rhesus monkeys were randomized to either a control (n = 40) or treated (n = 40) cohort. Animals were exposed to total body irradiation (TBI) of 6.8 Gy from a Cobalt60 gamma ray source, representing a dose that would be lethal in 70% of animals by 60 days of follow-up (LD70/60). Animals were administered a single subcutaneous dose of blinded treatment (control article [sterile saline] or Nplate [5mg/kg]) 24 hours post-irradiation. The primary efficacy endpoint was survival. Animals received medical management consisting of intravenous or subcutaneous fluids, anti-ulcer medication, anti-emetic medication, analgesics, antimicrobials, and other support as required.
Nplate significantly (one-sided p = 0.0002) increased 60-day survival in the irradiated animals: 72.5% survival (29/40) in the Nplate group compared to 32.5% survival (13/40) in the control group. In the same study, an exploratory cohort of n=40 animals received Nplate (5mg/kg) on day 1 and pegfilgrastim (0.3mg/kg) on days 1 and 8 post-irradiation. Survival in this combined treatment group was 87.5% (95% CI: (73.2%, 95.8%)). (FDA, 2021)
2022 Update
Annual policy review completed with a literature search using the MEDLINE database through May 2022. No new literature was identified that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2023 Update
Annual policy review completed with a literature search using the MEDLINE database through May 2023. No new literature was identified that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
2024 Update
Annual policy review completed with a literature search using the MEDLINE database through May 2024. No new literature was identified that would prompt a change in the coverage statement.
July 2024 Update
Studies of romiplostim to manage CIT have been limited to case series and small single-center studies that have shown that romiplostim is effective in increasing platelet counts in patients with solid tumors (al-Samkari et al, 2021; Miao et al, 2018, Parameswaran et al, 2014). Romiplostim use in non-myeloid hematologic malignancies has not been evaluated. In a multicenter retrospective analysis of 173 patients, 71% of patients with solid tumors showed romiplostim response. Pamareswaran et al describes a case series of 20 patients with solid tumors and CIT reported that romiplostim treatment improved platelet counts in all patients allowing chemotherapy resumption. In a phase II randomized trial in patients with solid tumors and CIT (Soff et al, 2019), 93% of patients treated with romiplostim experienced correction of their platelet count and thus CIT within 3 weeks compared with 12.5% of patients who did not receive romiplostim (P < .001). However, data suggests that TPO-RAs used for CIT may increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. Therefore, caution is warranted.
|
|
|
CPT/HCPCS: | |
|
|
References: |
Bussel JB, Buchanan GR, Nugent DJ, et al.(2011) A randomized, double-blind study of romiplostim to determine its safety and efficacy in children with immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2011;118(1):28-36. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-10-313908 Bussel JB, Kuter DJ, et al.(2006) AMG531, a thrombopoiesis-stimulating protein for chronic ITP. New Eng J Med. 2006; 335:1672-81. Food and Drug Administration.(2021) (2021) Nplate (romiplostim). Accessed September 29, 2021 at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/125268s168lbl.pdf Food and Drug Administration.(2021) Nplate (romiplostim). Accessed May 6, 2021 at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/125268s168lbl.pdf Kuter DJ, Bussel JB, et al.(2008) Efficacy of romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 372:395-403. Mathias SD, Li X, Eisen M et al.(2016) A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Determine the Effect of Romiplostim on Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia and Associated Burden in Their Parents. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Apr 1 Nplate® (Romiplostim) Product Information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc.; May, 2021. Tarantino MD, Bussel JB, Blanchette VS et al.(2016) Romiplostim in children with immune thrombocytopenia: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2016 Apr 18. pii: S0140-6736(16)00279-8 Tarantino MD, Bussel JB, Blanchette VS, et al.(2016) Romiplostim in children with immune thrombocytopenia: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2016;388(10039):45-54. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00279-8 Wong K, Chang PY, Fielden M, Downey AM, Bunin D, Bakke J, Gahagen J, Iyer L, Doshi S, Wierzbicki W, Authier S.(2020) Pharmacodynamics of romiplostim alone and in combination with pegfilgrastim on acute radiation-induced thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in non-human primates. Int J Radiat Biol. 2020 Jan;96(1):155-166. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1625488. Epub 2019 Jun 21. PMID: 31216213. |
|
|
Group specific policy will supersede this policy when applicable. This policy does not apply to the Wal-Mart Associates Group Health Plan participants or to the Tyson Group Health Plan participants.
CPT Codes Copyright © 2025 American Medical Association. |